by Mises
[Title Page and Publication Information]: The title page and publication details for the 1953 Yale University Press edition of 'The Theory of Money and Credit' by Ludwig von Mises, translated by H. E. Batson. [Table of Contents]: A comprehensive table of contents outlining the four parts of the book: The Nature of Money, The Value of Money, Money and Banking, and Monetary Reconstruction. It lists chapters covering the origin of money, the measurement of value, the quantity theory, the social consequences of variations in purchasing power, the business of banking, and the principles of sound money. [Table of Contents (Continued) and Prefaces]: This segment completes the table of contents and includes the prefaces to the 1952, 1934 (English), and 1924 (German) editions. Mises argues that the great inflations of the 20th century were man-made results of flawed doctrines like expansionism. Lionel Robbins introduces the work as a systematic synthesis of money and credit theory, highlighting Mises's early contributions to the theory of trade cycles and forced saving. Mises's prefaces track the evolution of his thought and the worsening monetary conditions of Europe between the world wars. [Part One, Chapter I: The Function of Money]: Mises defines the nature of money as a common medium of exchange necessitated by an economic order based on the division of labour and private property. He explains the origin of money through Menger's theory of marketability: individuals seek more marketable goods in indirect exchange to eventually acquire what they need. He also critiques the 'secondary functions' of money (standard of deferred payments, transmitter of value), arguing they are all derivative of its primary function as a medium of exchange. [Part One, Chapter II: On the Measurement of Value]: Mises argues that subjective use-values are immeasurable and can only be graded or ranked. He critiques attempts by Böhm-Bawerk, Fisher, and Schumpeter to quantify utility or total value, asserting that valuation is a direct psychological judgment rather than a measurement. Money does not measure value; rather, it serves as a common denominator for exchange-ratios, acting as a price-index that facilitates economic calculation for entrepreneurs and consumers. [Part One, Chapter III: The Various Kinds of Money]: Mises distinguishes between money proper and money-substitutes (claims to money payable on demand). He introduces a three-fold classification of money: commodity money (a commercial commodity like gold), fiat money (objects with legal qualification but no commodity value), and credit money (claims falling due in the future used as media of exchange). He critiques the nominalist 'State Theory of Money' (Knapp), asserting that even modern coins are essentially commodity money (ingots) whose weight and fineness are officially guaranteed. [Part One, Chapter IV: Money and the State]: The State's role in the market is subject to the same laws of price as any other agent. While the State can declare an object legal tender for existing debts, it cannot force a commodity to become money (a common medium of exchange) against the practice of the market. Mises uses the failure of bimetallic legislation and the transition to the gold standard to show that the State's influence is limited to its role as a large economic agent and its control over the mint and money-substitutes. [Part One, Chapter V: Money as an Economic Good]: Mises investigates the classification of money, concluding it is neither a production good nor a consumption good, but a 'medium of exchange'. Unlike other goods, an increase in the quantity of money does not increase social welfare or the national dividend. He clarifies that while money is part of 'private capital' (as an acquisitive instrument), it is not part of 'social capital' because it does not physically contribute to the productive process. [Part One, Chapter VI: The Enemies of Money]: Mises discusses the role of money in a socialist community, noting that while a purely socialistic order might use labor certificates, these are not money because they lack independent valuation. He also critiques 'money cranks' who believe social evils can be cured by eliminating money or gold, or by creating an 'elastic' credit system, arguing that such proposals often fail to understand the fundamental nature of banking and exchange. [Part Two, Chapter I: The Concept of the Value of Money]: Mises defines the central problem of monetary theory as the determination of the objective exchange-value (purchasing power) of money. Unlike other goods, the subjective value of money is derived from its objective exchange-value—the anticipated use-value of the goods it can buy. He argues that the economist's task is to explain this utility, which is essentially an economic rather than a technological or psychological problem. [Part Two, Chapter II: The Determinants of Purchasing Power (i-ii)]: Mises develops his 'Regression Theorem', explaining that the current value of money is linked to its past value, tracing back to the point where the monetary material was valued as a commodity. He critiques the mechanical versions of the Quantity Theory (Fisher) and Wicksell's interest-rate theory. He argues that variations in the quantity of money do not lead to proportionate changes in prices because the new money spreads gradually, altering the relative wealth of individuals and their subjective valuations differently. [Part Two, Chapter II: The Determinants of Purchasing Power (iii-iv)]: Mises continues his analysis of the Quantity Theory, refuting the 'hoarding' argument of the Banking School and explaining that all money, even in reserves, performs a monetary function. He critiques theories of 'dearness of living' by Wagner and Wieser, arguing that a general rise in prices cannot be explained by the extension of the money economy alone. Instead, he points to the market mechanism where sellers raise prices and buyers pay them in hopes of recouping losses elsewhere, leading to a gradual fall in the value of money. [Part Two, Chapter II: Excursuses]: Mises discusses the influence of the size of the monetary unit on prices, noting its significance in retail trade due to rounding. He also provides a methodological critique of Walter Lotz's review of his work, arguing that science requires more than the collection of 'facts' or the opinions of business men; it requires rigorous economic theory. [Part Two, Chapter III: Local Differences in the Value of Money]: Mises argues that the purchasing power of money tends toward equality globally, adjusted for transport costs and taxes. Alleged local differences in the 'cost of living' are usually due to differences in the quality or spatial position of the commodities being compared. Living in a 'dear' place like a spa is a choice to pay for specific local advantages, and higher money wages in such areas are compensatory rather than evidence of different monetary value. [Part Two, Chapter IV: Exchange-Ratio Between Different Kinds of Money]: Mises explains that the exchange-ratio between different kinds of money (e.g., gold and silver) is determined by their respective purchasing powers over commodities. He defends the Classical view that international movements of money are the cause, not the effect, of trade balances. In the last analysis, international trade is an exchange of goods for goods, and money distributes itself according to the intensity of demand in different areas. [Part Two, Chapter V: Measuring the Value of Money]: Mises critiques the use of index numbers to measure variations in the value of money. He argues that since there is no good with an unchanging exchange-value, measurement is theoretically impossible. He examines Wieser's refinement of the budgetary method and concludes that while index numbers may have limited practical utility for short-term political decisions, they cannot provide a scientifically accurate measure of the subjective significance of money. [Part Two, Chapter VI: Social Consequences of Variations in Purchasing Power]: Mises analyzes how fluctuations in the value of money redistribute income and wealth. Because price changes do not occur simultaneously, those who receive new money first (e.g., war contractors) benefit at the expense of those who receive it last (e.g., laborers, civil servants). He emphasizes that inflation falsifies economic calculation, leading to capital consumption by making part of capital appear as profit. He also notes that the law's assumption of monetary stability is a significant factor in the injury of creditors during inflation. [Part Two, Chapter VII: Monetary Policy]: Mises defines monetary policy as the attempt to influence the purchasing power of money. He critiques inflationism as a tool for unpopular government policies, used to fund expenditure without explicit taxation. He argues that inflation leads to capital destruction and eventual currency collapse. Deflationism is similarly rejected as a means of correcting past inflation. Mises concludes that the ideal is a money free from State influence, which in practice means a metallic standard like gold. [Part Two, Chapter VIII: The Monetary Policy of Etatism]: Mises critiques 'etatism'—the belief in the State's omnipotence—and its application to money. He refutes the idea that national prestige or wealth determines the value of money. He argues that authoritative price-fixing is incompatible with a division-of-labor economy and leads inevitably to socialism. He also attacks the balance-of-payments theory and the suppression of speculation, asserting that inflation, not trade deficits or speculators, is the true cause of currency depreciation. [Part Three, Chapter I: The Business of Banking]: Mises distinguishes between two branches of banking: the negotiation of credit (lending other people's money) and the granting of circulation credit (issuing fiduciary media). He defines 'commodity credit' as the exchange of present goods for future goods involving sacrifice, and 'circulation credit' as credit granted through the issue of fiduciary media (notes or deposits) without such sacrifice. He argues that fiduciary media are perfect substitutes for money and perform the monetary function, thus affecting the volume of money. [Part Three, Chapter II: The Evolution of Fiduciary Media]: Mises traces the development of fiduciary media from deposit systems and state minting. He distinguishes between the clearing system (reciprocal cancellation of claims) and the use of fiduciary media, noting that while clearing reduces the demand for money in the broader sense, fiduciary media reduce it in the narrower sense. He discusses the 'Gold-Exchange Standard' in countries like India as a system where silver coins function as metallic notes, and explores the theoretical possibility and political obstacles of an international world bank. [Part Three, Chapter III: Fiduciary Media and the Demand for Money]: Mises critiques the Banking School's doctrine of the 'elasticity' of fiduciary media. He argues that banks can arbitrarily increase the quantity of fiduciary media by lowering the interest rate below the 'natural' rate. He refutes the idea that a circulation based on commodity bills automatically adjusts to the needs of trade, asserting that the demand for credit is dependent on the bank's own interest policy. Fiduciary media do not automatically accommodate demand; they influence the objective exchange-value of money. [Part Three, Chapter IV: The Redemption of Fiduciary Media]: Mises examines the necessity of a redemption fund for maintaining the equivalence of money-substitutes and money. He argues that no bank can protect itself against a general loss of confidence (a run), as fiduciary media by nature involve promising the impossible (immediate redemption of all claims). He discusses the 'banking type of cover' (short-term bills) and its role in limiting the issue of fiduciary media, and the practice of central banks holding foreign bills as part of their reserves. [Part Three, Chapter V: Money, Credit, and Interest]: Mises develops his theory of the trade cycle based on the divergence between the 'natural' rate of interest and the 'money' rate charged by banks. If banks reduce the money rate below the natural rate through the issue of fiduciary media, they induce entrepreneurs to enter into excessively long 'roundabout' processes of production for which the available subsistence fund is insufficient. This leads to an artificial boom followed by an inevitable crisis and capital loss as the market re-establishes equilibrium. [Part Three, Chapter VI: Problems of Credit Policy (I-II)]: Mises reviews pre-war credit policies, focusing on Peel's Act and its failure to restrict fiduciary media in the form of deposits. He analyzes the discount policy of central banks as a means of maintaining solvency in a world market. He critiques the 'gold-premium policy' of the Bank of France and other 'little devices' used to hinder gold exports, arguing they only postpone necessary interest rate adjustments. Finally, he critiques the promotion of clearing systems as a misguided attempt to lower interest rates. [The Gold-Exchange Standard and Government Influence]: Mises examines the post-WWI transition to the gold-exchange standard, noting that while it aimed for stability, it undermined the gold standard's independence from government influence. He argues that the value of gold has become largely dependent on the policy of the United States Federal Reserve, effectively turning gold into a commodity subject to political intervention rather than a market-driven standard. [A Return to a Gold Currency and the Problem of Freedom of the Banks]: Mises discusses the necessity of returning to an actual gold currency to prevent future inflationary policies, despite the costs and potential fall in prices. He critiques the failure of state-regulated banking (etatism) and argues that while banking freedom alone cannot prevent inflation if the political climate favors state intervention, the centralization of banks-of-issue has historically facilitated government abuse of the monetary system. [Fisher's Proposal for a Commodity Standard]: A detailed critique of Irving Fisher's plan to stabilize the dollar's purchasing power using index numbers. Mises argues that the scheme is theoretically flawed because index numbers are arbitrary averages that cannot account for the non-uniform way price changes affect different commodities. He concludes that the plan is superfluous for short-term credit and impracticable for long-term transactions. [The Basic Questions of Future Currency Policy]: Mises outlines the choice between a return to the classical gold standard or a transition to a fiat-money standard regulated by index numbers. He reiterates that stable money is only possible in a social order that respects private property and limits government intervention, warning that the continued development of fiduciary media threatens the breakdown of the exchange system. [Part Four: Monetary Reconstruction - The Principle of Sound Money]: Mises defines 'sound money' as a classical liberal instrument designed to protect civil liberties against government despotism. He argues that the gold standard is an essential constitutional safeguard that prevents rulers from using inflation to bypass parliamentary control of finances. He critiques the shift away from these principles toward modern inflationism. [The Virtues and Alleged Shortcomings of the Gold Standard]: Mises defends the gold standard against charges of being deflationary, arguing that its primary virtue is making the monetary unit independent of political parties. He analyzes the psychology of inflation, noting it relies on public ignorance, and critiques the expansionist fallacy that lower interest rates can be artificially maintained through credit expansion without causing economic crises. [The Full-Employment Doctrine and Emergency Inflation]: Mises critiques the Keynesian full-employment doctrine as a revival of the 'insufficient supply of money' fallacy. He argues that institutional unemployment is caused by wage rates being fixed above market levels, and that 'full-employment policy' is merely a euphemism for inflation. He also rejects the 'emergency' argument for inflation, stating it is a tool for governments to circumvent the democratic will and deceive the citizenry. [Contemporary Currency Systems]: An overview of currency systems following the abandonment of the gold standard. Mises describes the 'flexible standard' (characterized by sudden devaluations), the 'freely-vacillating currency' (like the New Deal dollar), and the 'illusive standard' (where governments enforce fictitious parities through exchange control). He argues that exchange controls are abortive policies that lead to economic isolation and the decline of civilization. [The Return to Sound Money: Planning vs. Economic Freedom]: Mises argues that monetary reconstruction requires a total rejection of 'progressive' planning ideologies like the New Deal. He asserts that stable money is incompatible with a government bent on central planning and deficit spending. The return to the gold standard is presented as the only way to wrest the instrument of inflation from the hands of 'economic tsars'. [The Integral Gold Standard and Credit Expansion]: Mises emphasizes that a true gold standard must prevent both fiscal inflation and credit expansion for business. He critiques the 19th-century 'Banking School' errors and modern 'full-employment' policies that use credit expansion to support union wage demands. He concludes that inflation is the 'opium of the people,' used to hide the scarcity of material goods and the negative effects of anti-capitalist policies. [Currency Reform in Ruritania]: Using the hypothetical country 'Ruritania,' Mises provides a technical blueprint for currency stabilization. The process involves stopping inflation, establishing a conversion agency, and setting a legal parity based on market rates. He addresses concerns about the 'flight of capital' and the 'balance of payments,' arguing that a free market will naturally balance these factors if the government stops inflating. [The United States' Return to a Sound Currency]: Mises proposes a specific plan for the U.S. to return to the gold standard: 1) Stop all further inflation and credit expansion. 2) Re-establish a free market for gold. 3) Establish a new gold parity based on market rates. 4) Create a Conversion Agency to ensure unconditional convertibility. He insists on the withdrawal of small-denomination notes to ensure gold coins circulate among the public as a check against future government inflation. [The Controversy Concerning the Choice of the New Gold Parity]: Mises weighs in on the debate between 'restorers' (who want to return to old gold parities) and 'stabilizers' (who want a new parity based on current market value). He argues against restoration, as it causes harmful deflation and social unrest, citing the failures of British monetary policy after the Napoleonic wars and in 1925. He concludes that the choice of the gold standard is a choice for the market economy over totalitarian planning. [Appendix A: On the Classification of Monetary Theories]: Mises classifies monetary theories into 'catallactic' (integrated into exchange theory) and 'acatallactic' (not integrated). He focuses on the 'State Theory of Money' (nominalism) popularized by Knapp, which he dismisses as a non-theory because it ignores the problem of purchasing power. He argues that such doctrines merely serve as justifications for fiscal exploitation and inflation by the state. [Schumpeter's Claim Theory and the Concept of Metallism]: Mises critiques Schumpeter's attempt to build a catallactic 'claim theory' of money, finding it fragmentary. He then addresses the term 'metallism,' coined by Knapp to disparage non-nominalist theories. Mises corrects Knapp's historical errors regarding Smith and Ricardo and critiques Wieser and Philippovich for adopting Knapp's flawed terminology and classifications. [Appendix B: Translator's Note and Index]: The translator explains the choice of English equivalents for Mises' technical German terms, specifically 'fiduciary medium' for 'Umlaufsmittel.' A diagram illustrates the relationships between different types of money and substitutes. This is followed by a comprehensive index for the entire work.
The title page and publication details for the 1953 Yale University Press edition of 'The Theory of Money and Credit' by Ludwig von Mises, translated by H. E. Batson.
Read full textA comprehensive table of contents outlining the four parts of the book: The Nature of Money, The Value of Money, Money and Banking, and Monetary Reconstruction. It lists chapters covering the origin of money, the measurement of value, the quantity theory, the social consequences of variations in purchasing power, the business of banking, and the principles of sound money.
Read full textThis segment completes the table of contents and includes the prefaces to the 1952, 1934 (English), and 1924 (German) editions. Mises argues that the great inflations of the 20th century were man-made results of flawed doctrines like expansionism. Lionel Robbins introduces the work as a systematic synthesis of money and credit theory, highlighting Mises's early contributions to the theory of trade cycles and forced saving. Mises's prefaces track the evolution of his thought and the worsening monetary conditions of Europe between the world wars.
Read full textMises defines the nature of money as a common medium of exchange necessitated by an economic order based on the division of labour and private property. He explains the origin of money through Menger's theory of marketability: individuals seek more marketable goods in indirect exchange to eventually acquire what they need. He also critiques the 'secondary functions' of money (standard of deferred payments, transmitter of value), arguing they are all derivative of its primary function as a medium of exchange.
Read full textMises argues that subjective use-values are immeasurable and can only be graded or ranked. He critiques attempts by Böhm-Bawerk, Fisher, and Schumpeter to quantify utility or total value, asserting that valuation is a direct psychological judgment rather than a measurement. Money does not measure value; rather, it serves as a common denominator for exchange-ratios, acting as a price-index that facilitates economic calculation for entrepreneurs and consumers.
Read full textMises distinguishes between money proper and money-substitutes (claims to money payable on demand). He introduces a three-fold classification of money: commodity money (a commercial commodity like gold), fiat money (objects with legal qualification but no commodity value), and credit money (claims falling due in the future used as media of exchange). He critiques the nominalist 'State Theory of Money' (Knapp), asserting that even modern coins are essentially commodity money (ingots) whose weight and fineness are officially guaranteed.
Read full textThe State's role in the market is subject to the same laws of price as any other agent. While the State can declare an object legal tender for existing debts, it cannot force a commodity to become money (a common medium of exchange) against the practice of the market. Mises uses the failure of bimetallic legislation and the transition to the gold standard to show that the State's influence is limited to its role as a large economic agent and its control over the mint and money-substitutes.
Read full textMises investigates the classification of money, concluding it is neither a production good nor a consumption good, but a 'medium of exchange'. Unlike other goods, an increase in the quantity of money does not increase social welfare or the national dividend. He clarifies that while money is part of 'private capital' (as an acquisitive instrument), it is not part of 'social capital' because it does not physically contribute to the productive process.
Read full textMises discusses the role of money in a socialist community, noting that while a purely socialistic order might use labor certificates, these are not money because they lack independent valuation. He also critiques 'money cranks' who believe social evils can be cured by eliminating money or gold, or by creating an 'elastic' credit system, arguing that such proposals often fail to understand the fundamental nature of banking and exchange.
Read full textMises defines the central problem of monetary theory as the determination of the objective exchange-value (purchasing power) of money. Unlike other goods, the subjective value of money is derived from its objective exchange-value—the anticipated use-value of the goods it can buy. He argues that the economist's task is to explain this utility, which is essentially an economic rather than a technological or psychological problem.
Read full textMises develops his 'Regression Theorem', explaining that the current value of money is linked to its past value, tracing back to the point where the monetary material was valued as a commodity. He critiques the mechanical versions of the Quantity Theory (Fisher) and Wicksell's interest-rate theory. He argues that variations in the quantity of money do not lead to proportionate changes in prices because the new money spreads gradually, altering the relative wealth of individuals and their subjective valuations differently.
Read full textMises continues his analysis of the Quantity Theory, refuting the 'hoarding' argument of the Banking School and explaining that all money, even in reserves, performs a monetary function. He critiques theories of 'dearness of living' by Wagner and Wieser, arguing that a general rise in prices cannot be explained by the extension of the money economy alone. Instead, he points to the market mechanism where sellers raise prices and buyers pay them in hopes of recouping losses elsewhere, leading to a gradual fall in the value of money.
Read full textMises discusses the influence of the size of the monetary unit on prices, noting its significance in retail trade due to rounding. He also provides a methodological critique of Walter Lotz's review of his work, arguing that science requires more than the collection of 'facts' or the opinions of business men; it requires rigorous economic theory.
Read full textMises argues that the purchasing power of money tends toward equality globally, adjusted for transport costs and taxes. Alleged local differences in the 'cost of living' are usually due to differences in the quality or spatial position of the commodities being compared. Living in a 'dear' place like a spa is a choice to pay for specific local advantages, and higher money wages in such areas are compensatory rather than evidence of different monetary value.
Read full textMises explains that the exchange-ratio between different kinds of money (e.g., gold and silver) is determined by their respective purchasing powers over commodities. He defends the Classical view that international movements of money are the cause, not the effect, of trade balances. In the last analysis, international trade is an exchange of goods for goods, and money distributes itself according to the intensity of demand in different areas.
Read full textMises critiques the use of index numbers to measure variations in the value of money. He argues that since there is no good with an unchanging exchange-value, measurement is theoretically impossible. He examines Wieser's refinement of the budgetary method and concludes that while index numbers may have limited practical utility for short-term political decisions, they cannot provide a scientifically accurate measure of the subjective significance of money.
Read full textMises analyzes how fluctuations in the value of money redistribute income and wealth. Because price changes do not occur simultaneously, those who receive new money first (e.g., war contractors) benefit at the expense of those who receive it last (e.g., laborers, civil servants). He emphasizes that inflation falsifies economic calculation, leading to capital consumption by making part of capital appear as profit. He also notes that the law's assumption of monetary stability is a significant factor in the injury of creditors during inflation.
Read full textMises defines monetary policy as the attempt to influence the purchasing power of money. He critiques inflationism as a tool for unpopular government policies, used to fund expenditure without explicit taxation. He argues that inflation leads to capital destruction and eventual currency collapse. Deflationism is similarly rejected as a means of correcting past inflation. Mises concludes that the ideal is a money free from State influence, which in practice means a metallic standard like gold.
Read full textMises critiques 'etatism'—the belief in the State's omnipotence—and its application to money. He refutes the idea that national prestige or wealth determines the value of money. He argues that authoritative price-fixing is incompatible with a division-of-labor economy and leads inevitably to socialism. He also attacks the balance-of-payments theory and the suppression of speculation, asserting that inflation, not trade deficits or speculators, is the true cause of currency depreciation.
Read full textMises distinguishes between two branches of banking: the negotiation of credit (lending other people's money) and the granting of circulation credit (issuing fiduciary media). He defines 'commodity credit' as the exchange of present goods for future goods involving sacrifice, and 'circulation credit' as credit granted through the issue of fiduciary media (notes or deposits) without such sacrifice. He argues that fiduciary media are perfect substitutes for money and perform the monetary function, thus affecting the volume of money.
Read full textMises traces the development of fiduciary media from deposit systems and state minting. He distinguishes between the clearing system (reciprocal cancellation of claims) and the use of fiduciary media, noting that while clearing reduces the demand for money in the broader sense, fiduciary media reduce it in the narrower sense. He discusses the 'Gold-Exchange Standard' in countries like India as a system where silver coins function as metallic notes, and explores the theoretical possibility and political obstacles of an international world bank.
Read full textMises critiques the Banking School's doctrine of the 'elasticity' of fiduciary media. He argues that banks can arbitrarily increase the quantity of fiduciary media by lowering the interest rate below the 'natural' rate. He refutes the idea that a circulation based on commodity bills automatically adjusts to the needs of trade, asserting that the demand for credit is dependent on the bank's own interest policy. Fiduciary media do not automatically accommodate demand; they influence the objective exchange-value of money.
Read full textMises examines the necessity of a redemption fund for maintaining the equivalence of money-substitutes and money. He argues that no bank can protect itself against a general loss of confidence (a run), as fiduciary media by nature involve promising the impossible (immediate redemption of all claims). He discusses the 'banking type of cover' (short-term bills) and its role in limiting the issue of fiduciary media, and the practice of central banks holding foreign bills as part of their reserves.
Read full textMises develops his theory of the trade cycle based on the divergence between the 'natural' rate of interest and the 'money' rate charged by banks. If banks reduce the money rate below the natural rate through the issue of fiduciary media, they induce entrepreneurs to enter into excessively long 'roundabout' processes of production for which the available subsistence fund is insufficient. This leads to an artificial boom followed by an inevitable crisis and capital loss as the market re-establishes equilibrium.
Read full textMises reviews pre-war credit policies, focusing on Peel's Act and its failure to restrict fiduciary media in the form of deposits. He analyzes the discount policy of central banks as a means of maintaining solvency in a world market. He critiques the 'gold-premium policy' of the Bank of France and other 'little devices' used to hinder gold exports, arguing they only postpone necessary interest rate adjustments. Finally, he critiques the promotion of clearing systems as a misguided attempt to lower interest rates.
Read full textMises examines the post-WWI transition to the gold-exchange standard, noting that while it aimed for stability, it undermined the gold standard's independence from government influence. He argues that the value of gold has become largely dependent on the policy of the United States Federal Reserve, effectively turning gold into a commodity subject to political intervention rather than a market-driven standard.
Read full textMises discusses the necessity of returning to an actual gold currency to prevent future inflationary policies, despite the costs and potential fall in prices. He critiques the failure of state-regulated banking (etatism) and argues that while banking freedom alone cannot prevent inflation if the political climate favors state intervention, the centralization of banks-of-issue has historically facilitated government abuse of the monetary system.
Read full textA detailed critique of Irving Fisher's plan to stabilize the dollar's purchasing power using index numbers. Mises argues that the scheme is theoretically flawed because index numbers are arbitrary averages that cannot account for the non-uniform way price changes affect different commodities. He concludes that the plan is superfluous for short-term credit and impracticable for long-term transactions.
Read full textMises outlines the choice between a return to the classical gold standard or a transition to a fiat-money standard regulated by index numbers. He reiterates that stable money is only possible in a social order that respects private property and limits government intervention, warning that the continued development of fiduciary media threatens the breakdown of the exchange system.
Read full textMises defines 'sound money' as a classical liberal instrument designed to protect civil liberties against government despotism. He argues that the gold standard is an essential constitutional safeguard that prevents rulers from using inflation to bypass parliamentary control of finances. He critiques the shift away from these principles toward modern inflationism.
Read full textMises defends the gold standard against charges of being deflationary, arguing that its primary virtue is making the monetary unit independent of political parties. He analyzes the psychology of inflation, noting it relies on public ignorance, and critiques the expansionist fallacy that lower interest rates can be artificially maintained through credit expansion without causing economic crises.
Read full textMises critiques the Keynesian full-employment doctrine as a revival of the 'insufficient supply of money' fallacy. He argues that institutional unemployment is caused by wage rates being fixed above market levels, and that 'full-employment policy' is merely a euphemism for inflation. He also rejects the 'emergency' argument for inflation, stating it is a tool for governments to circumvent the democratic will and deceive the citizenry.
Read full textAn overview of currency systems following the abandonment of the gold standard. Mises describes the 'flexible standard' (characterized by sudden devaluations), the 'freely-vacillating currency' (like the New Deal dollar), and the 'illusive standard' (where governments enforce fictitious parities through exchange control). He argues that exchange controls are abortive policies that lead to economic isolation and the decline of civilization.
Read full textMises argues that monetary reconstruction requires a total rejection of 'progressive' planning ideologies like the New Deal. He asserts that stable money is incompatible with a government bent on central planning and deficit spending. The return to the gold standard is presented as the only way to wrest the instrument of inflation from the hands of 'economic tsars'.
Read full textMises emphasizes that a true gold standard must prevent both fiscal inflation and credit expansion for business. He critiques the 19th-century 'Banking School' errors and modern 'full-employment' policies that use credit expansion to support union wage demands. He concludes that inflation is the 'opium of the people,' used to hide the scarcity of material goods and the negative effects of anti-capitalist policies.
Read full textUsing the hypothetical country 'Ruritania,' Mises provides a technical blueprint for currency stabilization. The process involves stopping inflation, establishing a conversion agency, and setting a legal parity based on market rates. He addresses concerns about the 'flight of capital' and the 'balance of payments,' arguing that a free market will naturally balance these factors if the government stops inflating.
Read full textMises proposes a specific plan for the U.S. to return to the gold standard: 1) Stop all further inflation and credit expansion. 2) Re-establish a free market for gold. 3) Establish a new gold parity based on market rates. 4) Create a Conversion Agency to ensure unconditional convertibility. He insists on the withdrawal of small-denomination notes to ensure gold coins circulate among the public as a check against future government inflation.
Read full textMises weighs in on the debate between 'restorers' (who want to return to old gold parities) and 'stabilizers' (who want a new parity based on current market value). He argues against restoration, as it causes harmful deflation and social unrest, citing the failures of British monetary policy after the Napoleonic wars and in 1925. He concludes that the choice of the gold standard is a choice for the market economy over totalitarian planning.
Read full textMises classifies monetary theories into 'catallactic' (integrated into exchange theory) and 'acatallactic' (not integrated). He focuses on the 'State Theory of Money' (nominalism) popularized by Knapp, which he dismisses as a non-theory because it ignores the problem of purchasing power. He argues that such doctrines merely serve as justifications for fiscal exploitation and inflation by the state.
Read full textMises critiques Schumpeter's attempt to build a catallactic 'claim theory' of money, finding it fragmentary. He then addresses the term 'metallism,' coined by Knapp to disparage non-nominalist theories. Mises corrects Knapp's historical errors regarding Smith and Ricardo and critiques Wieser and Philippovich for adopting Knapp's flawed terminology and classifications.
Read full textThe translator explains the choice of English equivalents for Mises' technical German terms, specifically 'fiduciary medium' for 'Umlaufsmittel.' A diagram illustrates the relationships between different types of money and substitutes. This is followed by a comprehensive index for the entire work.
Read full text