by Sennholz
[Author Biography and Introduction to the Communist Manifesto in America]: Hans Sennholz introduces the argument that much of the Communist Manifesto has been implemented in the United States through the 'Great Society' programs. He distinguishes between 'Communists' (party members) and 'patriotic liberals' who share the same economic objectives of a planned economy while maintaining a commitment to American representative government, though he argues their lack of concern for property rights undermines other civil liberties. [Section II: Philosophical Materialism and the Critique of Capitalism]: Sennholz explores the shared philosophical basis of 'ontological materialism' between American liberals and Communists, arguing that both groups view economic forces as the primary driver of history. He critiques thinkers like W.W. Rostow and Alvin Hanson for their rejection of the market economy, and asserts that liberal criticisms of 'monopoly' and 'exploitation' mirror Soviet propaganda, making it impossible for liberals to effectively refute Communist ideology. [Section III: The Radical Left and the Failure of Middle-of-the-Roadism]: The author discusses the emergence of a 'Radical Left' in America, which he views as a logical offshoot of mainstream liberalism. He argues that because 'middle-of-the-road' solutions inevitably fail to solve economic dilemmas, consistent thinkers are driven toward more radical, revolutionary positions like Communism, identifying emotionally with figures such as Castro and Mao. [Section IV: The Socialist Platform and the Great Society]: Sennholz compares the 1964 Socialist Party Platform with President Johnson's Great Society programs, noting striking similarities in their calls for a 'war on poverty,' public works, and expanded social security. He details socialist demands for the nationalization of natural resources and utilities, arguing that the Great Society is essentially implementing the socialist agenda under the guise of American tradition.
Hans Sennholz introduces the argument that much of the Communist Manifesto has been implemented in the United States through the 'Great Society' programs. He distinguishes between 'Communists' (party members) and 'patriotic liberals' who share the same economic objectives of a planned economy while maintaining a commitment to American representative government, though he argues their lack of concern for property rights undermines other civil liberties.
Read full textSennholz explores the shared philosophical basis of 'ontological materialism' between American liberals and Communists, arguing that both groups view economic forces as the primary driver of history. He critiques thinkers like W.W. Rostow and Alvin Hanson for their rejection of the market economy, and asserts that liberal criticisms of 'monopoly' and 'exploitation' mirror Soviet propaganda, making it impossible for liberals to effectively refute Communist ideology.
Read full textThe author discusses the emergence of a 'Radical Left' in America, which he views as a logical offshoot of mainstream liberalism. He argues that because 'middle-of-the-road' solutions inevitably fail to solve economic dilemmas, consistent thinkers are driven toward more radical, revolutionary positions like Communism, identifying emotionally with figures such as Castro and Mao.
Read full textSennholz compares the 1964 Socialist Party Platform with President Johnson's Great Society programs, noting striking similarities in their calls for a 'war on poverty,' public works, and expanded social security. He details socialist demands for the nationalization of natural resources and utilities, arguing that the Great Society is essentially implementing the socialist agenda under the guise of American tradition.
Read full text