by Strigl
[Front Matter and Title Page]: Title page and publication metadata for Richard Strigl's essay in the Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, including information about the editors and the publisher J. C. B. Mohr. [I. Theory and Practice]: Strigl examines the deep divide between economic theory and practice, particularly in the field of national economy. He argues that while theory must follow its own internal logic, a bridge is needed to make theoretical insights useful for practical economic policy without merging the two distinct spheres. [2. Economic Policy and Liberal National Economy]: This section analyzes the historical unity of theory and policy in classical liberalism. Strigl discusses Adam Smith's 'Wealth of Nations' as a policy goal and critiques the classical reliance on 'natural laws,' such as the international division of labor and the iron law of wages. He explains how the perceived failures of liberal theory to address distribution and social issues led to its decline and the rise of Marxism and interventionism. [3. Vulgar Economics]: Strigl critiques the 'Historical School' and the resulting 'Vulgar Economics' that emerged when practice abandoned rigorous theory. He argues that interventionist policies often rely on flawed, inconsistent, or superficial theories (Vulgärökonomie) that mistake symptoms for causes and fail to account for the complex indirect effects of state measures like price ceilings or subsidies. [4. Pure Theory as the Basis of Economic Policy]: Strigl advocates for 'Pure Theory' (based on marginal analysis) as the necessary foundation for sound economic policy. He introduces the concept of 'data'—the social and natural conditions that theory uses to explain outcomes—and argues that economic policy should be understood as an attempt to change these data. By separating pure theoretical systems from political value judgments, science can provide a neutral framework for evaluating the consequences of different policy means, even if the ultimate goals remain subjective.
Title page and publication metadata for Richard Strigl's essay in the Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, including information about the editors and the publisher J. C. B. Mohr.
Read full textStrigl examines the deep divide between economic theory and practice, particularly in the field of national economy. He argues that while theory must follow its own internal logic, a bridge is needed to make theoretical insights useful for practical economic policy without merging the two distinct spheres.
Read full textThis section analyzes the historical unity of theory and policy in classical liberalism. Strigl discusses Adam Smith's 'Wealth of Nations' as a policy goal and critiques the classical reliance on 'natural laws,' such as the international division of labor and the iron law of wages. He explains how the perceived failures of liberal theory to address distribution and social issues led to its decline and the rise of Marxism and interventionism.
Read full textStrigl critiques the 'Historical School' and the resulting 'Vulgar Economics' that emerged when practice abandoned rigorous theory. He argues that interventionist policies often rely on flawed, inconsistent, or superficial theories (Vulgärökonomie) that mistake symptoms for causes and fail to account for the complex indirect effects of state measures like price ceilings or subsidies.
Read full textStrigl advocates for 'Pure Theory' (based on marginal analysis) as the necessary foundation for sound economic policy. He introduces the concept of 'data'—the social and natural conditions that theory uses to explain outcomes—and argues that economic policy should be understood as an attempt to change these data. By separating pure theoretical systems from political value judgments, science can provide a neutral framework for evaluating the consequences of different policy means, even if the ultimate goals remain subjective.
Read full text